Suwannee Democrat

Local News

January 3, 2014

P&Z board to recommend 2 public hearings to BOCC

Live Oak — The Suwannee County Planning and Zoning Board of Adjustments voted 4-0 recently to recommend a resolution that would require two public hearings before the Suwannee County Board of County Commissioners prior to a company seeking to locate at the catalyst site.

Currently, if a company sought a piece of property at the catalyst site, no public hearings would be necessary since the board voted unanimously to allow businesses to locate at the catalyst site “by right,” which would waive certain requirements companies would have to adhere to, including obtaining county permits.

If a company purchases county-owned property on the catalyst site, two public hearings are required for the county to enter into a development agreement with the proposed company, as required by the Florida Statutes.

The public’s cry to change the “by right” language began when Integrated Waste Management Systems began showing interest in locating hospital, medical and infectious waste incinerators at the catalyst site in Western Suwannee County.

As a result, County Administrator Randy Harris provided the county commissioners with a proposal that would add a public hearing to the process before a company can locate at the catalyst site.

According to a county official, the language in the public hearing proposal does not give the commissioners the authority to deny or approve a company’s rights to the site. Allowable uses would remain unchanged which was adopted in the “by right” regulations. If a company meets the broad requirements of allowable uses, the commissioners cannot approve or deny the land.

The proposal stated, “For properties designated as Rural Area of Critical Economic Concern Catalyst Site, any proposed development on said site shall require one public hearing before the Suwannee County Board of County Commissioners. The purpose of the public hearing is for the Commission to receive factual, documented evidence that the proposed development can or cannot adhere to all relevant local, state and federal rules, regulations and guidelines that pertain to the specific development proposal.”

The commissioners then voted 4-1 to adopt the recommendation by Harris of adding a third public hearing. Commissioner Jason Bashaw voted against.

The proposal was then submitted to the planning and zoning board of adjustments to be approved and later moved into the land development regulations for the catalyst site. However, the planning and zoning board recommended there be two public hearings added to the process.

If adopted, two public hearings would be required before a company can locate at the catalyst site. Companies seeking to enter into a development agreement with the county would be required to hold two additional public hearings.

The recommendation will have to pass two public hearings before the county commissioners before it becomes law.

1
Text Only
Local News
Business Marquee
AP Video
Bon Jovi Helps Open Low-income Housing in Philly Pipeline Opponents Protest on National Mall Hagel Gets Preview of New High-tech Projects S.C. Man Apologizes for Naked Walk in Wal-Mart New Country Music Hall of Fame Inductees Named 'Piles' of Bodies in South Sudan Slaughter New Yorkers Celebrate Cherry Blossom Blooms SCOTUS Hears Tv-over-Internet Case Justice Dept. Broadening Criteria for Clemency Chief Mate: Crew Told to Escape After Passengers 'Miss Meadows' Takes Holmes Back to Her Roots Biden: Russia Must Stop Talking, Start Acting David Moyes Out As Manchester United Manager Raw: Leopard Bites Man in India Iowa College Finds Beauty in Bulldogs High Court to Hear Dispute of TV Over Internet Stowaway Teen Forces Review of Airport Security
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
House Ads
Twitter Updates
Suwannee Democrat on Facebook
Poll

Do you think the city of Live Oak should have a city-manager form of government or leave it as a city-administrator form of government?

Change to a city-manager.
Keep it as city-administrator.
Don’t care either way.
What are you talking about?
     View Results
Facebook